199A Proposed Regs or Final: Use What Is Best for 2018 Tax Returns

The Final 199A regulations issued last Friday indicated that a taxpayer could use either the proposed regulations issued in August of 2018 or the final regulations when preparing their 2018 income tax returns.

One area where the proposed regulations are better than the final regulations is in regards to having rental income paid by a C corporation under common ownership be treated as QBI.

Under the proposed regulations, rents could be paid by a C corporation under common ownership and have that rental income qualify as QBI. The final regulations specifically states that this rent needs to be paid by either an individual or RPE (relevant pass-through entity).

Therefore, for farmers who farm as a C corporation and pay rent to themselves or an RPE, for 2018 only, you may go ahead and treat that rent income as QBI.

For 2019 and thereafter, none of that rent income will automatically qualify as QBI. The safe harbor outlined in our previous post will grant you QBI status, however, that requires working as a landlord at least 250 hours and it may subject you to SE tax.

  • Principal
  • CliftonLarsonAllen
  • Walla Walla, Washington
  • 509-823-2920

Paul Neiffer is a certified public accountant and business advisor specializing in income taxation, accounting services, and succession planning for farmers and agribusiness processors. Paul is a principal with CliftonLarsonAllen in Walla Walla, Washington, as well as a regular speaker at national conferences and contributor at agweb.com. Raised on a farm in central Washington, he has been immersed in the ag industry his entire life, including the last 30 years professionally. Paul and his wife purchase an 180 acre ranch in 2016 and enjoy keeping it full of animals.

Comments

So, my understanding is that triple net lease income is NOT QBI UNLESS it is paid in a common ownership scenario. Is that correct?
Thanks for your help!

If you are filing Form 4835 for a client, either for a partnership or an individual tax payer, do you need to be concerned about number of hours worked? Is this considered a “rental” or is this considered a “trade of business”?

The answer as with lots of tax law is that it depends. If the landlord shares in costs and provides some services such as maintaining waterways, irrigation systems, etc. it is likely a trade or business. If not it is a rental and then you need to meet the hours.

Did the final regulations address the transition rule under the grain glitch fix? Your post from December 20, 2018, Patrons May Lose Most of 199A for 2018, provides two separate examples for allocating expenses. Was there any guidance on this issue? If not, are CPAs allowed to chose any method for allocation that is considered reasonable?

No. We are still waiting for that guidance. If none shows up soon, I would suggest either waiting until after March 1 or realize you may need to file an amended tax return.