Fannie Mae Issues Quality Control Self-Assessment Tool
by: Anna DeSimone
May 9, 2013 Fannie Mae issued guidance for lenders to manage risk and comply with Fannie Mae’s Selling Guide requirements. The guidance includes highly suggested practices for quality control and includes an 8-page Quality Control Self-Assessment worksheet. With increased focus on QC during the manufacturing process, Fannie Mae has published additional guidance “Beyond the Guide” and is offering self-paced training and live web seminars.
The Quality Control Self-Assessment worksheet includes checklists that are structured into the following 10 segments outlined below. Please note that this article includes key topics and that the worksheet should be carefully reviewed for complete information pertaining to the lender’s quality assurance responsibility.
1. Governance/Authority
Senior Management, CEO and Board of Directors, as applicable, are accountable and actively involved in:
Establishing and driving to a target defect rate
Monitoring the monthly defect rate, issues identified, and remediation activity
Creating a QC philosophy to identify, remediate, and monitor the risks associated with originating good quality loans
Ensuring that an independent audit of the QC process is conducted, and if appropriate, establishing an action plan for remediation or policy/procedure changes identified from such an audit
Overseeing the process of underwriting approval authority and authority levels
Ensuring that the QC reporting structure is independent of the production, underwriting, and closing functions.
Providing appropriate resources to the QC function that will enable adherence to required timelines
2. Training
The lender has a robust training program that develops the core competencies of the origination and QC staff associated with originating and evaluating good quality loans. The program ensures that:
All QC personnel performing loan reviews are experienced and tenured in origination and underwriting
Detailed standard operating procedures, including updates on industry changes, are available to all employees involved with, or affected by, the QC process
Employees’ participation in training is tracked and monitored
Training content is current to the lender’s investor guidelines and reflects current industry practices
3. Defect Rate
A target defect is established for gross and net defects
A set of standards for loan quality including a severity rating system and defect/error thresholds
Review at least annually the target defect rate to ensure it continues to meet credit risk needs
Note: the worksheet includes a detailed Defect Rate Tutorial with illustrations of gross and net calculations
4. Pre-Funding
Lenders has a clearly defined pre-funding quality control program
The program is being managed or performed by someone other than a party to loan originations sampling of loans with characteristics related to defects identified in prior reviews
Program includes performing a monthly pre-funding discretionary QC loan review focusing on higher-risk loans, in addition to the monthly random/statistical sample
Steps include validation/verification of AUS data integrity, employment, SSN, MI coverage, assets, appraisal review
Steps include a full re-underwrite of sampled loans including a re-calculation of income, assets and liabilities (reconcile 1003 with credit report)
Steps include fraud checks using industry tools and vendors; obtaining IRS tax transcripts prior to underwriting, validating the condo project meets FNMA requirements and ensuring eligibility documentation is retained;
A process to identify the root cause of the identified defects and system hard core stops to ensure that loans do not close with defects
Use of Fannie Mae tools such as UCDP and Early Check to ensure accurate delivery data
Open line of communication between business unites and post-closing staff
Remediation process to correct defects prior to close and a process to re-test loans identified with defects prior to closing the loan
5. Post-Closing
The lender must ensure that the post-closing QC plan includes the following:
A minimum 10% Random Sample or a Valid Statistical Sample
Samples are representative of the lender’s originations (book of business) including size, production channels, geographic areas of operation, specialty products/programs and Early Payment Defaults (EPD)
A separate monthly discretionary sample focusing on loans with higher-risk characteristics including unique underwriting/processing/appraisal techniques, lender personnel, patterns identified in other reviews, TPOs, higher-risk property types (leaseholds, co-ops, manufactured homes)
Timing of Reviews
Sampling loans within 30 days of closing
Completing the review within 60 days of the sample selection
Finalizing reports to senior management within 30 days of completed reviews
Completing the overall QC cycle within 120 days (Fannie Mae recommends a 60-90 day QC cycle)
Re-verify Critical Data
Employment/income directly with the source of the original documentation
Obtain the IRS Tax Transcripts (if not obtained prior to closing)
Assets: attempt to reverify directly with the source of the original documentation
Credit: new in-file credit report from a different credit reporting agency; each credit reference listed on the report for non-traditional credit
Accuracy and integrity of the AUS information used to make the lending decision
Compare supporting documentation to the AUS data integrity including: borrower/co-borrower income, employment, employment type, assets, property type, SSN, income, address, loan terms, type and purpose
Obtain, Compare, Verify, Correct and Maintain
Occupancy check for primary residences and second homes
Social Security Number validation with the SS Administration if SSN discrepancy is not resolved at origination
Review potential re flag messages found on the AUS or alerts created by other sources
Review manually underwritten loans for compliance with FNMA guidelines and eligibility criteria
Review closing documents for completeness, accuracy with all underwriting and eligibility requirements
Correction of material errors if found and updating and resubmission of affected documents
Notification to Fannie Mae if loan is determined to be ineligible or has AUS data errors
Notification to Fannie Mae within 30 days of discovery during the QC process of misrepresentation
Maintain QC records for minimum of 3 years after loan closing
6. Appraisals
Ensuring that all loans the lender originates comply with the provisions of the Appraiser Independence Requirements (AIR) and are validated through the post-close QC process
Completing a desk review on 90% of the loans selected for a QC review
Conducting a field review by an appraiser not affiliated with the original appraisal on 10% of the loans selected for a QC review
When utilizing an appraisal management company (AMC) ensure that the AMC is complying with the AIR provisions
Confirm that the AMC uses appraisers that have a current license, are in good standing, and have the proper insurance
Track appraisal defects by appraisal company and appraiser
Utilize industry tools to score the appraisals received from AMCs
Review the AMC’s policies and procedures annually
Require the AMC to have a process to review each appraisal for accuracy prior to providing it to lender
Ordering an AVM report to validate/support the appraised value
Keeping the appraisal review team separate from the underwriting team
Providing an appraisal review protocol based on the results of the appraisal tools or appraised value
Ensuring staff is trained to use and understand the appraisal tools/AVM reports that are utilized
Utilizing Fannie Mae’s appraisal quality feedback, including loan-specific reports and messages from UCDP and aggregated (trend) reports available via Message Manager, to identify and remediate
appraisal quality issues
7. Reporting
Reports are shared with senior management, business units and pre- and post-funding QC staff within 30 days after completion of the review to be used in determining the root cause of identified defects. The lender’s monthly reports show:
Defects found in the pre-funding QC process
Defects found in the post-funding QC process
Defect rate for each severity rating (e.g. Significant, Moderate, Low)
Separation of underwriting/credit findings with compliance finding and defect rate
Gross defect rate (and net rate if applicable)
Defects identified by Branch, Originator, Underwriter, Processor, Funder, Closer and TPO
Defect rate trending over time
Root cause trending by categories and sub-categories (income-miscalculation or income-unverified)
Loan level details
8. Action Planning
Action plan/corrective action/remediation of all identified defects including: Defect, Remediation, Outcome/resolution, Source of finding, Implementation date, Re-test, Root cause and Controls
Remediation or resolution achieved
Remediation/resolution not achieved, next steps
Defects and outcome/resolution reported to senior management
9. QC Vendor
The lender is fully accountable for the work performed by its contractors. If using a QC vendor the lender:
Understands that a contract for services is not a substitute for the lender’s own proprietary QC procedures
Review the QC vendor’s policies and procedures annually
Conduct ongoing dialogue with the QC vendor on a regular basis (no less than quarterly)
Validate the vendor’s monthly QC findings, including testing a percentage of the “no finding” results, prior to the final report being presented to management within the required 120-day timeframe (inclusive of rebuttals).
Have a process to verify that the QC vendor:
– follows Fannie Mae QC requirements and meets the required QC review timeframes
– uses an agreed-upon severity rating system and definitions
– captures a gross defect rate, not just the number of exceptions
– Has a separate fraud investigation team or notifies lender when fraud is identified
– follows requirements for managing the severity rate, including not changing the initial finding
10. Third Party Originations
The lender must have a process for managing the TPO (broker/correspondent) business to ensure good quality originations which include:
Reviewing loans from correspondents prior to purchase
Reviewing a representative sample of the mortgage loans received from the TPO at least once annually
Conducting discretionary reviews of the TPO’s production
Rigorously managing the TPO approval and oversight process
Ensuring the TPO has a current license
Maintaining a TPO scorecard that includes QC results, pull-through rate, number of EPDs and repurchases
Validating the experience of TPO origination and QC staff
Reviewing the TPO’s QC policies and procedures annually and ensuring they meet Fannie Mae requirements
Continual monitoring TPO compliance through internet searches, FHA compare ratio, GSA, LDP lists and HUD Neighborhood Watch
About the Author:
Anna DeSimone is President and Founder of Bankers Advisory, Inc.
Anna DeSimone founded Bankers Advisory in 1986 and is a nationally recognized authority in residential mortgage lending. She has received numerous industry awards and has authored more than 40 best practices guides and hundreds of articles.
Hey very nice blog!!
Hi there,I enjoy reading through your article post, I wanted to write a little comment to support you and wish you a good
continuationAll the best for all your blogging efforts.
Appreciate the recommendation! Let me try it out.
Keep working ,great job!
Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful to me! I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure
my visitors will find that very useful.