What About Cooperative Transition Rule

Farmers who sell grain or other farm commodities to a cooperative with a fiscal year ending sometime in 2018 are required to do an extra calculation in arriving at their 2018 QBI deduction. This extra step is only for 2018. Starting in 2019, the farmer will calculate the QBI deduction based on all farm income and then only reduce it for the lesser of (1) 9% of QBI related to cooperative “operations” or (2) 50% of wages relate to cooperative operations.

We have been informed by reliable sources that the only IRS guidance we will receive on this is in instructions to Form 8903 – Domestic Productions Activity Deduction. This guidance is quoted as follows:

“Note. The repeal of section 199 for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, does not apply to a qualified payment received by a patron from a specified agricultural or horticultural cooperative in a tax year beginning after December 31, 2017, to the extent such qualified payment is attributable to qualified production activities income with respect to which a deduction is allowable to the cooperative under former section 199 for a tax year of the cooperative beginning before January 1, 2018. Such qualified payment remains subject to former section 199 and any section 199 deduction allocated by the cooperative to its patrons related to such qualified payment may be deducted by such patrons in accordance with former section 199. In addition, no deduction is allowed under section 199A for such qualified payments.”

Therefore, based on this guidance, we need to allocate the 2018 farmer’s income similar to how we allocated it under the old Section 199 rules. For ease of simplicity, farmers in 2018 need to allocate their income to three buckets. The first bucket is for payments received by the farmer from the cooperative before the fiscal year-end of the cooperative. (You need to know the fiscal year-end of the cooperative.) The second bucket is payments from the cooperative after its year-end. Finally, the last bucket is all other payments.

Net income from all farm operations including Section 1245 gains from equipment trades, etc. should be calculated. One method of allocating net income is by the percentage of gross receipts for each of the three buckets.

The portion of net income before the cooperative fiscal year-end of net farm income does not qualify for any QBI deduction. The farmer’s deduction for this bucket is the DPAD from the cooperative. For most farmers, they actually received most of this DPAD in 2017 and may receive a tiny amount in 2018. Almost all DPAD from cooperatives received in 2018 is the old Section 199 DPAD and is deducted above the line.

The remaining amount of net farm income (the second and third buckets) is used to calculate the QBI deduction. From that number, the farmer then needs to reduce the deduction by the lesser of 9% of cooperative QBI (the amount from the second bucket calculation) or 50% of wages (again from the calculation in the second bucket). That is your final Section 199A deduction for 2018 (plus any Section 199A DPAD from a cooperative which is likely zero).

Now, we know this sounds complicated, but actually it is not that hard to do. It just involves some extra math steps. Here is an example to show how to do it:

Sue, has $100,000 of net farm income. Her bucket #1 receipts were $200,000, bucket #2 receipts were $300,000 and bucket #3 receipts were $500,000. Therefore, 20% of her farm income does not qualify for QBI. The remaining $80,000 qualifies for a tentative QBI deduction of $16,000. Total wages were $50,000, therefore, wages allocated to bucket #2 is $15,000. 50% of this number if $7,500. 9% of bucket #2 QBI is $30,000 times 9% or $2,700. This number is lower than 50% of wages, so we need to reduce the QBI deduction to $13,300. This is Sue’s final Section 199A QBI deduction since she did not get any additional 199A DPAD from her cooperative.

Allocation by gross receipts is merely one way of determining the net income of each bucket. Other allocation methods may be reasonable and appropriate.

The hardest part of doing these calculations is that appropriate footnotes need to be included with any partnership or S corporation tax return that contains these three buckets of income. That footnote can easily be 30-50 lines long. Since many farmer’s tax returns are due March 1 and we have received our “guidance”, there is no expectation that farmers who normally file by March 1 will get any extension on this filing date.

  • Principal
  • CliftonLarsonAllen
  • Walla Walla, Washington
  • 509-823-2920

Paul Neiffer is a certified public accountant and business advisor specializing in income taxation, accounting services, and succession planning for farmers and agribusiness processors. Paul is a principal with CliftonLarsonAllen in Walla Walla, Washington, as well as a regular speaker at national conferences and contributor at agweb.com. Raised on a farm in central Washington, he has been immersed in the ag industry his entire life, including the last 30 years professionally. Paul and his wife purchase an 180 acre ranch in 2016 and enjoy keeping it full of animals.

Comments

My cooperative sent a letter to my corporation listing the fiscal year ended August 31,2018 DPAD amount. The 1099 listed the same amount. Can a CORP deduct the amount from 2018 taxes ?

I’m fairly certain there is a large swath of the tax preparing populace that is unaware of this wrinkle with the timing of the cooperative payments. I have no doubt many farmers will be receiving larger QBI deductions than they are entitled to and the IRS is unlikely to catch on in this first year of the new bill. I’m erring on the side of caution and calculating the deduction by hand since my software is similarly incorrect. I’d rather do it right than have my client potentially hear from the IRS later.

What do I report on a partnership K-1 related to QBI and the Cooperative Transition Rule? Is this a net QBI considering the Transition Rule adjustment or do I provide QBI (un-adjusted) and the Transition Rule adjustment separetely?

Also, is the Cooperative Transition Rules applied differently if an individual is able to aggregate? In other, words do I need the bucket 1, 2 & 3 information for each business that is being aggregated in order to calculate the Transition Rule amounts?

Example: Assuming no W2 wages so no extra QBI late adjustment

Before FYE coop sales 300
After FYE 200 coop sales
All Other including equipment gains 1000

800 net

20% nonqualifying = 160

640 qualifying however of this 640, it is not all subject to SE tax, so it doesn’t seem to make sense to use the 20% again to net out the SE tax or SE health ins portion.
Please let me know what angle I’m missing.

When you calculate the amount of SE tax deduction and SE health insurance deduction, you will reduce it by the 20%. That increases your QBI amount.

If we have section 1245 equipment gains and we are using the three bucket gross receipt income method to allocate percentages, it doesn’t seem that the calculations for SE tax and SE health ins ineligible for QBI would be an accurate adjustment since the equipment gains are not subject to SE tax, etc yet are being allocated into the percentages we are reducing the QBI total by in the end.

The whole deduction calculation per the final regulations is “interesting”. It is based on gross income. I would agree that 1245 gains should not be part of that allocation.

My Question is the same as Mary Ann’s. I have a coop that issued a letter saying they reported all of the grain sales for 2018 in Per Unit Retain Allocations and that it allows the cooperative to maximize their deduction under section 199A. That makes me think that my client can’t use that grain to figure a QBID. Is that correct?

Paul,
Some cooperatives do not classify the grain sales as per unit retains in box 3 of the PATR. Does it matter or is it simply any grain sales to a cooperative during 2018 through its fiscal year are excluded by the patron?

Thanks!

It matters if the sales were included in the calculation of the cooperative’s Section 199 / 199A DPAD. It can’t just assume they don’t matter.

are the calculations different if the coop is taking the sec 199A deduction… the one coop sent a letter to its patrons and told them that they will not be able to consider these payments as qualified production activities income when computing sec 188 deduction?

Thanks Paul. Quick question to clarify some things. Do qualified payments include the small dividend checks farmers receive from cooperatives (reported on box 1 1099-PATR)? Or do we only need to make a bucket 1 adjustment for sales of grain/livestock (per unit retain alloc.)? Thanks for clarifying.

I have similar ? to Kevin’s, above. Farmer delivers beets to ACSC in 2017, but gets paid in installments on Nov 2017, march 2018 and Nov 2018; their fiscal year is Aug 31. The Nov final is after fiscal yearend but is for prior year delivered and paid out in installments. I am leaning towards Bucket #1 even tho received later. Their is also a letter informing as to DPAD old #199 associating it to payments made in 2018 for 2017 production. Another wrinkle? What do you think?
Thanks

I agree. I will be doing a new blog post on this.

Paul, in your example, you divide income based on farmer’s receipt prior to cooperative fiscal year end and receipt after year end but does pool accounting by the cooperative change the “the extent such qualified payment is attributable to qualified production activities income with respect to which a deduction is allowable to the cooperative under former section 199”? For instance, a fruit grower delivers to a cooperative with an August 31st fiscal year. During the fiscal year ended in 2018, payments are made to the grower for the 2016 pool and advances on the 2017 pool (the majority of payments received relate to the 2017 pool advances). The cooperative closes the 2016 pool June 30, 2018 and begins the 2017 pool in July so it appears that the majority of qualified production activities income for the fiscal year relates to the 2016 pool. Do you think there is any basis to this analysis or am I just overthinking the issue. Thank you.

Im getting nervous with the QBi ( because I think I understand it now LOL ) …. client that has QBI of
$191926 and 70.76% is from Coop and no wages are involved the deduction I come up with is $38385
( less 1/2 ss and health insurance ) am I correct

Remember, you have to deduct the SE tax and Health insurance deduction before you apply the 20% and then check 20% of taxable income.

Paul, I agree with your example of how to compute QBI regarding the Cooperative transition rule for 2018 tax year. I like your approach using the three basket method when receiving payments from fiscal year ending Cooperatives. However shouldn’t the tentative QBI deduction of $16,000 also be reduced by its share of above the line deductions (i.e. self employment tax and SE health insurance) before any reduction computation. If so it would seem to provide a looping nightmare.

I had already netted those numbers into the final QBI for the example. You would need to actually calculate and allocate those deductions based on those net income numbers, etc.