Lower Rate Versus Higher SE/Payroll Tax

As we mentioned yesterday, the Senate has released their framework on tax reform and their is a 17.4% deduction for active business income.  However, there is the restriction that it is limited to 50% of wages subject to withholding.  I had a couple of examples on this yesterday.

The bottom line is for our farmers who farm as an S corporation and they have held their wages fairly low, they are likely not to get much benefit from the new deduction for business income.  If a farmer pays him or herself lets say $50,000 of wages during the year, the maximum deduction allowed under the Senate proposal is $25,000.  If farm income flowing through from the S corporation is greater than about $144,000, then any of the excess income over this amount will not be available for the 17.4% deduction.

This issue may also apply to those LLCs who have structured their operations to reduce SE tax.  In that case, the members will have to decide, is it better to pay SE tax at 15.3% or forget the extra 17.4% deduction.  For most farmers under the wage base, I am guessing they will pick the last option since that tax savings will likely be much lower than 15.3%.

Schedule F farmers should not have any issue since they are paying SE tax on all of that active business income.

We will keep you posted as this works it way through the Senate Finance Committee.

  • Principal
  • CliftonLarsonAllen
  • Yakima, Washington
  • 509-823-2920

Paul Neiffer is a certified public accountant and business advisor specializing in income taxation, accounting services, and succession planning for farmers and agribusiness processors. Paul is a partner with CliftonLarsonAllen in Yakima, Washington, as well as a regular speaker at national conferences and contributor at agweb.com. Raised on a farm in central Washington, he has been immersed in the ag industry his entire life, including the last 30 years professionally. In fact, Paul drives combine each summer for his cousins and that is what he considers a vacation.

Leave a comment for Paul.

If you would like to leave a comment for Paul, follow the link above, however, please make sure to include your email address so that he can reply to your comment (your email address will not automatically show up).

Comments

Any more comments on the RE rent being subject to SE tax? Or how this would work? This will be a real burden for our retired farmers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Our Email List

* indicates required