Hedging vs. Forward Cash Contracting

imagesCA3A6DT1 Most ag grain producers are able to lock in prices by using either a hedge or a forward contract.  Forward cash contracting involves a commitment to deliver grain to a grain buyer at a future time.  Both alternatives can be used to: price before and after harvest; establish a return for storage of grain; and reduce price risk.  Thus, deciding which alternative to use depends upon weighing hedging advantages and disadvantages in comparison to forward cash contracting.

Hedging Advantages vs. Forward Cash Contracting

  • Hedging allows flexibility to later select the appropriate delivery point to take advantage of competing buyers for your grain.
  • Hedging allows you to reverse a decision based upon changes in growing conditions, changes in price outlook and changes in the condition of stored grain.  Once a forward cash contract commitment is made, it is very difficult to change or cancel.  A position in a futures contract can be terminated almost immediately.
  • Hedging allows the farmer to speculate on basis improving.
  • Hedging generally lengthens the potential pricing period to 20 to 24 months, including about one year before and after harvest.  This can be longer than a forward cash contract.

Hedging Disadvantages vs. Forward Cash Contracting

  • In hedging, you may not know the final price due to changes in the final basis as compared to the initial basis.
  • Hedging is more complex than forward cash contracting.  To hedge successfully, a farmer must understand futures markets, cash markets and the basis relationships between the two markets.  They must trade in a futures market and involve a commodity broker and have a banker who understands and is committed to hedging.
  • Margin money is required to maintain a futures position.  A forward cash contract typically does not involve margin deposits.
  • Hedging involves commissions and interest on margin money.  These extra costs may average 1 to 2 cents per bushel.
  • Since hedging generally involves using future contracts in either 1,000 or 5,000 bushel lots, the farmer is locked into these quantities to hedge.
  • Basis levels may not gain as expected and can even widen more than expected.

Remember that hedging never guarantees a profit.  The hedging decision needs to take into account production costs and market outlook.  However, the good use of a hedging program can help the farmer prevent pricing indecision where the farmer “does-nothing-until-forced-to-sell-strategy” which normally leads to much lower prices.

  • Principal
  • CliftonLarsonAllen
  • Walla Walla, Washington
  • 509-823-2920

Paul Neiffer is a certified public accountant and business advisor specializing in income taxation, accounting services, and succession planning for farmers and agribusiness processors. Paul is a principal with CliftonLarsonAllen in Walla Walla, Washington, as well as a regular speaker at national conferences and contributor at agweb.com. Raised on a farm in central Washington, he has been immersed in the ag industry his entire life, including the last 30 years professionally. Paul and his wife purchase an 180 acre ranch in 2016 and enjoy keeping it full of animals.

Comments are closed.